If a report uses a combined thermal-and-visible presentation, retain the available uncombined views and identify what the combination adds. The reviewer should be able to distinguish scene context from the thermal observation supporting the report.
Choose report views by purpose
| View | Role to define |
|---|---|
| Thermal view | Review of the recorded thermal pattern and retained information |
| Visible photograph | Identification and scene context |
| Combined presentation, if supported | Aids orientation while preserving its documented limitations |
| Annotated report copy | Explains the reviewer’s selected observations and conclusions |
The FLIR image-mode reference describes different views and saved information for its own camera series. It is a useful example of why display choice and file contents should be checked separately, not proof that a Phonemax app stores every view in one file.
Avoid a presentation-only evidence gap
Ask what originals the actual supplied app makes available. Keep the report copy linked to those files. If only a flattened combined image can be retained, state that limitation and have the reviewer decide whether it meets the task. Do not promise that a recipient can remove the visible layer later without documented support.
A report may use a combined image to orient the reader while retaining a separate thermal view for review. That arrangement is a suggested reporting choice, not a claim that any specific file is radiometric or that the combination improves measurement accuracy.
The P20 Pro product information does not verify a fusion mode or reversible layered output. Use the file-traceability guide and confirm the delivered app’s output options with Phonemax before adopting the report template. No fusion or reporting trial is presented here.
Laat een reactie achter
Alle reacties worden gemodereerd voordat ze worden gepubliceerd.
Deze site wordt beschermd door hCaptcha en het privacybeleid en de servicevoorwaarden van hCaptcha zijn van toepassing.