A “0.5-second response” claim needs a named start event, end event and measurement method. Sensor response, live image updates, shutter action, file saving and report delivery are different intervals and should not share an undefined speed claim.
Write the timing question first
| Interval | Example boundary to agree |
|---|---|
| App startup | Launch action to a usable thermal view |
| Capture action | User command to the documented capture outcome |
| File saving | Capture outcome to a confirmed saved file |
| Reporting | Approved send action to confirmed receipt |
| Sensor response | The manufacturer’s specified detector-response measure and conditions |
FLIR’s frame-rate explanation distinguishes image updates from detector thermal time constant. It describes its own camera context and does not supply a Phonemax response-time result.
Keep a timed workflow observation within its scope
For an approved sample assessment, document the device, app, mode, initial state and method. Agree how repeated observations and unsuccessful attempts will be reported. A screen recording may help a reviewer inspect app behavior, but does not by itself measure the thermal detector’s physical response.
The current P20 Pro thermal graphic lists 25Hz refresh rate. That is not proof of a 0.5-second sensor response, app startup or save time. Ask for a separate documented specification or evaluation for the interval that matters to the work task.
This article reports no latency measurement. Use the sample timing and frame-rate acceptance checklist and send Phonemax the exact timed requirement before comparing speed claims.
Laat een reactie achter
Alle reacties worden gemodereerd voordat ze worden gepubliceerd.
Deze site wordt beschermd door hCaptcha en het privacybeleid en de servicevoorwaarden van hCaptcha zijn van toepassing.